<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GreenGrl &#187; correctness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greengrl.org/tag/correctness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greengrl.org</link>
	<description>Taking Care of Mother Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In deciding whether to be green, should I consider costs and benefits or just benefits?</title>
		<link>http://greengrl.org/in-deciding-whether-to-be-green-should-i-consider-costs-and-benefits-or-just-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://greengrl.org/in-deciding-whether-to-be-green-should-i-consider-costs-and-benefits-or-just-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 00:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Green Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[correctness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hysteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insignificant change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyoto accord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[untold billions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greengrl.org/in-deciding-whether-to-be-green-should-i-consider-costs-and-benefits-or-just-benefits/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For example, it&#8217;s a foregone conclustion that most recycling incurs a lot more cost than it provides a benefit. And if the U.S. were to follow the Kyoto accord, it would spend untold billions to make a statistically insignificant change in global temperature. Should I consider costs when deciding whether to be green, or does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For example, it&#8217;s a foregone conclustion that most recycling incurs a lot more cost than it provides a benefit.  And if the U.S. were to follow the Kyoto accord, it would spend untold billions to make a statistically insignificant change in global temperature.  Should I consider costs when deciding whether to be green, or does politicial correctness and green hysteria require me to consider only the benefits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greengrl.org/in-deciding-whether-to-be-green-should-i-consider-costs-and-benefits-or-just-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

